If World Cup international locations have been going face to face primarily based on their oil and gasoline emissions, who would win with the bottom local weather footprint?
Sports activities followers across the globe have been gripped by the FIFA Males’s World Cup, watching their nations’ soccer (or as we are saying in the US, soccer) groups face off in Qatar with nice enthusiasm. Right here at RMI, we too are following the matches carefully. The Local weather Intelligence Program is especially excited concerning the event as a result of there may be one large factor that sports activities followers and local weather analysts have in widespread: they love knowledge!
Whereas soccer followers could debate the skillful strengths of their group in opposition to the competitors, we will leverage the ability of clear emissions knowledge to evaluate how the collaborating nations stack up of their oil and gasoline local weather footprint. This led us to ask the query, “If World Cup international locations have been going head-to-head primarily based on their oil and gasoline emissions, who would win with the bottom local weather footprint?”
If World Cup international locations have been going head-to-head primarily based on their oil and gasoline emissions, who would win with the bottom local weather footprint?
Introducing the First Oil & Fuel World Cup Bracket
To reply this query, we arrange a bracket much like the actual World Cup event bracket, with 32 beginning groups, the place the highest two groups (those with lowest emissions depth) in every group “advance.”
This football-inspired thought experiment required some modifications to the FIFA qualification course of. For fairer comparability, we eliminated any nation competing on this 12 months’s event that produces lower than 0.02% of worldwide oil and gasoline (like Japan, Switzerland, and Costa Rica), and substituted bigger producing international locations (like Iraq, Norway, and China).
Nations have been assessed face to face primarily based on the emissions depth of their oil and gasoline operations — together with manufacturing, processing, and transport — primarily based on a CO2e 20-year international warming potential. Emissions depth presents a great metric for direct comparability as a result of it ranges the taking part in area by displaying whose oils and gases are “dirtier,” no matter quantity produced.
This evaluation was made doable thanks to 2 local weather intelligence databases: the Oil Local weather Index plus Fuel and Local weather TRACE, which not too long ago launched its up to date nation emissions inventories throughout COP27. Outdoors of this whimsical utility of the info, there are real-world local weather implications of differentiating oil and gasoline sources by their emissions depth. Our hope is that by pulling again the veil on the local weather impacts of each oil and gasoline useful resource globally with these instruments, policymakers and markets alike can take near-term steps to prioritize lower-emitting sources as all of us try to realize a 1.5°C future.
Be part of us in watching the remainder of the World Cup event and see how our bracket stacks as much as actual outcomes!
© 2022 Rocky Mountain Institute. Printed with permission. Initially posted on RMI Outlet.
Associated: Local weather TRACE Lifts The Veil On Oil & Fuel Emissions
Recognize CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech information protection? Take into account turning into a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
Do not need to miss a cleantech story? Join day by day information updates from CleanTechnica on e-mail. Or comply with us on Google Information!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, need to promote, or need to recommend a visitor for our CleanTech Discuss podcast? Contact us right here.
