Google’s John Mueller defined what he would take into account being a search high quality challenge, inflicting rating points particular to Google contemplating the positioning not “high quality.” John stated on Twitter “to me, high quality points are issues that customers would take into account to be problematic.”
He added that technical points that customers don’t see possible wouldn’t be thought-about a top quality challenge by Google. John stated, “unhealthy rel-canonical resulting in an alternate URL being listed one thing customers would discover? Most likely not.”
John additionally stated it’s common to see each high quality and technical points on the identical website however that doesn’t imply the 2 are the identical. John wrote, “each technical points & high quality points are extraordinarily huge fields, there’s at all times some overlap (eg, is velocity a top quality or a technical challenge?).” “If a website has obtrusive points in one of many two, then tweaking the opposite aspect will not make an enormous impression,” he added.
Listed here are the tweets associated to this, so you may see it in context:
.@johnmu are search engine optimisation technical points high quality points? I’ve seen articles that say you stated they have been and that you just stated they weren’t lol
Simply making an attempt to get clarification.
— Kristine Schachinger (@schachin) September 21, 2022
Each technical points & high quality points are extraordinarily huge fields, there’s at all times some overlap (eg, is velocity a top quality or a technical challenge?). If a website has obtrusive points in one of many two, then tweaking the opposite aspect will not make an enormous impression.
— 🌽〈hyperlink href=//johnmu.com rel=canonical 〉🌽 (@JohnMu) September 21, 2022
It is determined by what you take into account a top quality challenge. To me, high quality points are issues that customers would take into account to be problematic. Is a foul rel-canonical resulting in an alternate URL being listed one thing customers would discover? Most likely not.
— 🌽〈hyperlink href=//johnmu.com rel=canonical 〉🌽 (@JohnMu) September 21, 2022
And considerably associated however in a distinct thread, John wrote “Simply because an internet site is technically legitimate does not imply it is a helpful & related search outcome for customers.”
Simply because an internet site is technically legitimate does not imply it is a helpful & related search outcome for customers.
— 🌽〈hyperlink href=//johnmu.com rel=canonical 〉🌽 (@JohnMu) September 21, 2022
So technical points and high quality points are completely different, in keeping with John Mueller of Google.
Discussion board dialogue at Twitter.
